put in UC by a team of professionals, promote the practice of service learning in different university courses. This implies a major effort to disseminate our work. The expectation is that, in future, A + S is a concept easily understood: a metaphor that people can associate with their courses.
However, this implies a risk: there may be teachers who think they are implementing A + S in their courses, for the simple fact of having some connection with excluded groups of society, not understanding that A + S is not just a metaphor but also a methodology that demands hard work and dedication. Without this, we may need courses that instead of building society, destroy frustrating expectations, delivering defective services or many other ways.
The issue is as follows: A + S UC courses they can encourage, but what about a bad year? What role should take the A + S UC to find such courses, which will not do a responsible job to ensure that their intervention is responsible? Can we remain comfortable with the fact that further developing their work? Sebastian Zulueta
0 comments:
Post a Comment